Book a meeting
Insights

European Commission formally asks Sweden and France to stop higher withholding tax to foreign pension institutions and insurance companies

EU urges Sweden and France to align dividend tax rules with EU law, ensuring fair treatment for foreign pension and insurance entities.

From the European Commission's February 2021 infringement package: Sweden and France requested to stop applying a higher dividend withholding tax to foreign pension institutions and insurance companies respectively.

France

The European Commission formally asks France to change its withholding tax rules on dividends paid to “unit linked insurance policies” (“ULIPs”) offered by foreign insurance companies established in the  EU or EEA. A ULIP is a life insurance scheme where the premiums paid by the policy-holder are used to purchase units in investment funds selected by that person, and where the dividends paid out by the funds are passed on by the insurer to the policy-holder. Insurance companies established in the EU or EEA are required to pay a final withholding tax on French dividends received in relation to ULIPs. However, insurance companies established in France either pay no withholding tax on dividends in relation to ULIPs, or can credit the withholding tax paid against French corporation tax, which amounts to zero. This is because the dividends received constitute deductible provisions or technical reserves. The Commission deems that these rules infringe on the free movement of capital (Article 63(1) of the TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement). France has two months to reply to the arguments raised by the Commission. Otherwise, the Commission may decide to send a reasoned opinion.

Sweden

The European Commission formally asks Sweden to look at a potential incompatibility of its legislation with EU law on taxation of dividends paid to public pension institutions. Swedish public pension funds are, as government agencies, entirely exempt from tax liability. Dividends paid to equivalent non-resident public pension institutions are subject to a withholding tax, commonly at a reduced rate of 15% as provided for in the tax treaties concluded between Sweden and other EU/EEA countries. The Commission considers that such a fiscal scheme under which dividends paid to foreign public pension institutions are subject to less favorable treatment than similar distributions in purely domestic situations may infringe the free movement of capital (Article 63(1)of the TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement). Sweden has two months to reply to the arguments raised by the Commission after which the Commission may decide to send a reasoned opinion.

Source: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/INF_21_441

If you have any questions what these procedures may mean for your organization, please do not hesitate to send your questions to [email protected].

Jeroen van der Wal

Founder and CEO

Topics

Unlock your 

withholding tax recovery potential

Get in touch and see for yourself how you can take control and optimize your withholding tax returns

Insights you might also like

OCTOBER 6, 2026 • 18 minute read

Italy’s new 20% WHT on dividends paid to EU/EEA pension funds – equal rates, but equal taxation?

Italy has increased the withholding tax (“WHT”) on Italian-source dividends paid to qualifying EU/EEA pension funds from 11% to 20%, with effect from 12 August 2026. The change is intended to align the rate applicable to foreign pension funds with the 20% substitute tax applicable to the investment results of Italian pension funds.

Tax news

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 • 16 minute read

iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25): the CJEU draws the line between real and theoretical tax neutralization

The Court of Justice of the European Union has delivered its judgment in iShares Europe ETF (C-139/25), concerning the Spanish taxation of dividends received by a US investment fund. The case adds a new question to the CJEU's extensive case law on discriminatory withholding taxation of non-resident investment funds: can a restriction on the free movement of capital be neutralized on the ground that a foreign fund could have chosen a tax treatment in its state of residence under which it would have been able to credit the source-state tax, even though it did not make that choice?

Tax news

AUGUST 18, 2026 • 10 minute read

What MiKaDiv Means for Non-Resident Investors

Discover how MiKaDiv changes German withholding tax reclaims, and what impact it has for non-resident investors.

Tax news